What
do you say to one hundred fifth graders who were expecting a hero to walk into
their classroom and share a magical history with them?
I
couldn’t figure it out—not at first. Sure, it was a fantastic opportunity to
reach one or two young students—perhaps more—to plant seeds that might sprout
into something I would consider positive. But how could I do that without
losing them or boring them or disappointing them?
They
wanted to know if I had met Martin Luther King. I hadn’t. They wanted to know
if I was on the burning bus. I wasn’t. They wanted to know if I’d ever been
beaten up. I haven’t, at least not in the Civil Rights Movement. They wanted to
know if I had ever watched someone else get beaten up. There, I had a story.
But
that story’s in my novel, Bridge of the
Single Hair, so I won’t re-tell it here. I did tell the fifth graders the
story and their eyes grew huge. Watching them take in my words and turn them
into pictures in their heads, I thought about all the ways in which their
imaginations—working at full strength in that moment—were generally stunted by
our free market society.
I
also thought about the lies they had been told. So I started with Abraham
Lincoln. “Who knows who he is?” Several hands shot up. “He was the President.”
Good answer. And? “He ended slavery.”
Right
answer. But not true.
Their
lovely alert eyes widened again. Not true?
The
history books tell you President Lincoln was the Great Emancipator. They say he ended slavery with his Emancipation Proclamation, signed at the
end of 1862 to take effect in January 1863, early in the Civil War.
Then
I asked the students the killer question: How
many slaves did Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation free?
Right.
The answer is zero. Lincoln wrote it to free zero slaves. I told the fifth
graders that he wrote a decree ordering the freeing of slaves only residing in the states in
rebellion. That meant slaves under the jurisdiction of Lincoln’s government
were excluded. In fact, in 1861 (two years prior to Lincoln’s Emancipation
Proclamation) John C. Fremont issued his own Emancipation Proclamation for the
slaves of Missouri, a state under federal jurisdiction at the time in the
person of Fremont. What happened? The
Great Emancipator fired him and revoked the order.
If
Lincoln had written a law ordering German citizens to refrain from eating meat
on Saturday, it would have had just as much effect. The Confederacy had no
respect for the government of the United States. It was not their government.
And Lincoln—a pretty sharp guy—knew that. The Emancipation Proclamation was nothing but a PR maneuver, partly to
threaten the South and partly to appease those who pushed for some affirmative
move by the President.
I
told the students that social activists, people who put their bodies on the
line for justice, are like drops of water. The more that come together, the
greater the force they exert on the status quo. Lincoln was the status quo. He
said that his goal was “to preserve the union,” and if he could do that without
freeing a single slave, “I would do it.” But from way back in history,
abolitionists had pushed and shoved, coming together through time, finally to
press on Lincoln until he had to give way and step aside for history.
Had
Abraham Lincoln lived, however, slavery might have continued to reign in the
Southern states for quite a while longer—at least, if he had controlled and
contained the radical Republicans in Congress, then agitating to reconstruct
the South and assign full citizenship rights to black Americans. Lincoln and
his successor, the weak Andrew Johnson, were far more interested in appeasement
of the white South than in black rights.
At
the end of the Civil War, the South rose up again, determined to gain full
control over the newly freed slaves—of whom an estimated one-half million had already
fled (one in every five slaves). The southern states passed the infamous Black
Codes, erecting a wall in front of citizenship: African Americans could not
vote, own property, hold office, testify in court, sit on juries, or file a
claim in court. If stopped by the local constabulary, each black man must
produce a signed document, a contract binding him to some white plantation
owner for a year. The children of freed slaves could and often were removed
from their parents’ custody and given, like chattel, to plantation owners, slaves
once more.
Luckily—at
least for a while it was lucky—the Radical Republicans moved to enact the Civil
Rights bill of 1866, shoving Johnson aside and establishing full citizenship
for the freed slaves. They sent federal troops South to become the police force
for ten years. After one year in force, the Black Codes were expunged.
For
the next ten years, African Americans enjoyed the benefits and even some of the
privileges accorded white Americans. They struggled to get an education after
years of being denied the right to read. They voted and acquired property and
ran for office—winning, in many cases, to become legislators and Congressmen.
(Of course, there were no women directly involved in this since they would not
acquire the right to vote until 1920, a fact that brought out some racism among
white suffragettes, a number of whom argued that “savages” should not be
permitted to vote while genteel, educated white ladies could not.)
When
Federal troops left the South in 1877, Jim Crow dropped like an iron curtain
between citizenship rights and black citizens. In 1883 the US Supreme Court
overturned the Civil Rights Act that had prohibited segregation in public
facilities and the South began to terrorize and intimidate and prevent citizens
of color from exercising any rights.
Thanks
to D.W. Griffith and his “Birth of a Nation,” the Ku Klux Klan, which had gone
down in its own flames prior to 1880, rose again in 1915. Griffin’s theme of
the Klan as noble protectors of refined white womanhood against predatory black
men provided the cloak needed for the Klan’s true purpose: To drive black
voters from the polls and support a system of segregation that would continue
to keep the white man’s foot on the black man’s neck for the foreseeable
future.
Instances
of rebellion pre-date the Civil War and continue through today’s Occupy
movement. Drops of water, accumulating, accumulating. For example, the first
recorded Freedom Rider was the valiant Ida B. Wells, in 1884: the first drop of
water. It would take another eighty years before the step she took to oppose
segregation would inspire Americans across the United States, drawing thousands
to the South to join with thousands of committed Southerners, most African
American, in risking their lives to end a system that had destroyed so many
lives for so many years.
And
now we see Radical Republicans rising up again, this time in ignominy, their
goal to return the country to pre-Reconstruction days—Newt Gingrich even
suggests child slavery might not be a bad idea.
We
have not paid the price of liberty. We have not been vigilant. Having watched
Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, we have forgotten the first principle of decency:
What they can do to one, they can do to all. Check out the Congressional move
to declare the “homeland” a “battleground,” in which any American may be
incarcerated without benefit of legal counsel or trial.
As
the song says, there’s a man going ‘round, taking names.
That’s
what I hoped to warn the fifth graders about—that if they weren’t willing to
pay for liberty, just as the 1863 Civil Rights Act became meaninglessness under
the assaults of reactionaries, the gains subsequently achieved will be
ephemeral if not actively defended.
When
I had finished speaking and stood, somewhat numb and tired, surrounded by kids
calling out more questions, I felt something encircle my waist. When I looked
down, I saw the top of a little girl’s head as she burrowed into me. I barely
had time to hug her back before she turned and fled. I never saw her face.
But
it didn’t matter. I knew I had reached one child.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.